> For reference of glyph, I am using > http://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetUnihanData.pl?codepoint=f9b1 > and so on. I think that is confusing the matter more than necessary. *Unfortunately*, what one gets when using the above is not up to the image (glyph) quality that the Unicode consortium usually maintains. Please refer to: 1. The *official* Unicode standard charts, in PDF form(!) (e.g. http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U3300.pdf). AND(!!!!!!) 2. The 10646-1:2000 charts, which for the Han characters have up to 5 reference glyphs (there are plans to use just one reference glyph for the next edition, just as already done for the Unicode standard, as well as 10646-2:2001). Until you do so, I, at least, will continue to mostly ignore this thread. Kind regards /kent k -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguities Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguities Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguities Jake Morrison
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguities Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Glenn Maynard
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Glenn Maynard
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Kent Karlsson
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Tomohiro KUBOTA
- RE: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Kent Karlsson
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Glenn Maynard
- RE: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Kent Karlsson
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguiti... Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguities Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguities Glenn Maynard
- Re: Unicode, character ambiguities Glenn Maynard