> I can imagine, and wouldn't dream of revisiting it. The hard-won
> agreement you outline, however, is _unrelated_ to my point: I merely
> pointed out that the description as it stands has ended up being mildly
> confusing .
The way I am handling this is by tiptoing around it with the press . I have
deliberately allowed our press release to imply that the participating LUGs will
be particiating together . If they ask I will explain that some LUGs will be
showing on days that are significantly more convenient for them ( this being the
first time around for us ) . Without the single "day" the impact to the press
is significantly lessened . We are playing up that htis event was entirely
organized on the web through electronic communication and activism . The press
so loves the internet as a means of activism ...
There are probably more people involved in this than were required to block the
Chinese phone lines that were supposed to be used to turn in 'dissidents' !!!
> Perhaps my point was unclear: I wasn't talking about whether you
> "advertise the competition". I was pointing out that one highlight's
> Linux's strengths by emphasising what it does uniquely, or does
> especially well -- not what it can do that's as close as possible to MS
> Windows.
>
Good point .
---
This message was automatically sent by the Linux Demo Days mailing list
To remove yourself from this list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the "unsubcribe" in your message body.
