Yes I respect your words and your knowledge, What we are talking is almost same but in different ways. You have a little more experience in this way, Actually what I am?
I am just a windows User for last 10 years, and now for 2 years I am just switching distros, Just to experience them same like you, Ubuntu is great in some places like its user friendly, Installation of tools via apt-get is really appreciate able, mounting Windows filesystem is an other its strong point, But there are some Areas where it gets defeated by other distros, Simply I had luck to manage my LAMP server on ubuntu 9.10 once, and i was getting more than a lot problems, Same once more i had luck to play with KVM on ubuntu 9.10 it have some kinda bugs still but on other hand KVM works perfectly in 9.04. All distros are perfect in some areas but there are still bugs in every one, RHEL, SUSE are the one on Enterprise Administrators side, But for Newbies in Linux World ubuntu and debian distros are best. On 26 April 2010 07:50, hard wyrd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM, ◣_◢ <[email protected]> wrote: > >> RHEL is Linux. Ubuntu is Linux. So what's the difference? >> >> Windows XP is windows, Windows Server 2k8 is windows, whats the >> difference? >> tools? yes obviously tools. Because of these tools servers are servers and >> other distros are others. If we can make these tools our self (As you said >> linux is Open) Yes we can make these tools just by spending a lot of time in >> this. Nothing is impossible in Linux. But yeah if you can make it then there >> is no difference in RHEL and ubuntu, About ubuntu lucid servers. I have >> personal experience that they just dont work perfect, There are much bugs to >> fix. thats why ubuntu is continuously launching new versions. >> > > My premise _exactly. Which is why you think _first_ when deploying Ubuntu > in an enterprise environment and assess what you need. There are niches that > RHEL works perfectly well, and where Ubuntu will suffice. But that does not > mean that Ubuntu is a failure. And, again, Ubuntu's main target is the > desktop sector and although they are slowly crawling on the server and > enterprise space, they have yet to show enterprise tools compared to RHEL > and SuSE. So yes, we can't expect massive Ubuntu deployments in the > enterprise just yet. But they're getting there. Again, this doesn't mean > Ubuntu is a failure :) > > >> >> As we know RHEL is standalone distro and ubuntu is based on Debian. >> All the functionality is of Debian then? just a little more tools in >> ubuntu along with appearance changes? Why not to use debian then, >> I am talking about SUSE and RHEL because all they have is their own, They >> haven't copied anything from anything else, We need novell in all feilds. >> Even in unix and windows too (Specially in LAN IPX and other networking) >> >> > > Exactly. For stability, a lot of enterprise deployments opt for Debian for > stability reasons and not for bleeding edge packages. Where Fedora is to > RHEL, so is Ubuntu is to Debian. > > >> >> Those who are good in linux are no more on ubuntu or debian they are >> practicing in suse and rhel just to get some experience about these distros >> and get some gud job in companies. >> > > Not true :). It depends upon the need. I'm working for an enterprise, and I > use Ubuntu as my primary desktop. I have Fedora and CentOS virtual machines > on remote servers. SLES on local servers. I'm using all of them > simultaneously. As a consultant, it is my job to explore these distros and > and provide alternatives to the client. > > There are cases where you just want to use RHEL, sometimes you want to use > SLES, and times you just want Debian or Ubuntu. It's up to you really :). I > have different distros for no particular reason at all. I love variety. That > makes me explore them as well in a production setting. :) > > >> >> I am sorry for my bad english as english is not my first language, Thats >> why i cant speak it perfect. >> I am sorry if I have offended with my posts :) >> >> > No problem. No offense taken. We are just having a healthy discussion :). > We're all on the same side :). > > > -- > Penguin, penguin, and more penguin. > > Believe that within the brain is a brain, and within it another brain, and > so on and so forth. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users > Group. > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > For more options, visit our group at > http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup > -- There are two kinda Impossibles 1. Possible Impossible 2. Impossible Impossible Possible Impossible is about what some people says; "Nothing is impossible, man efforts to make impossible just possible" Quid says; "Impossible for me is unknown" And those who know "Impossible Impossible" and believe in that, they just don't know me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
