Yes, because anything that requires years of training and experience
is obviously empirically ‘better’ than BSD/MacOS/Windows/Solaris.
First rule of computing: software is rubbish. No exceptions.
You can pay for rubbish or you can get it for free. You can get the
source code or you might not. At 4:00 in the morning when your
webserver is broken and SQL isn't being a team player, it doesn't make
a lick of difference what you're using. Software just sucks.
Sent from my iPod
On Apr 26, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Xavier Naldo <[email protected]>
wrote:
Right on brother!! but for the group's sake, CANT WE ALL JUST GET
ALONG???
We are LINUX, NOT winblows (ooops sorry, windows). Isnt it our goal
to improve the GNU/Linux OS? That is what makes Linux so special, is
that we have variety and it feeds for different strokes for
different folks!!
In my opinion, Linux is the people's operating system. AND IT IS
MUCH BETTER THAN WINDOWS!
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:50 AM, hard wyrd <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM, ◣_◢ <[email protected]> wrote:
RHEL is Linux. Ubuntu is Linux. So what's the difference?
Windows XP is windows, Windows Server 2k8 is windows, whats the
difference?
tools? yes obviously tools. Because of these tools servers are
servers and other distros are others. If we can make these tools our
self (As you said linux is Open) Yes we can make these tools just by
spending a lot of time in this. Nothing is impossible in Linux. But
yeah if you can make it then there is no difference in RHEL and
ubuntu, About ubuntu lucid servers. I have personal experience that
they just dont work perfect, There are much bugs to fix. thats why
ubuntu is continuously launching new versions.
My premise _exactly. Which is why you think _first_ when deploying
Ubuntu in an enterprise environment and assess what you need. There
are niches that RHEL works perfectly well, and where Ubuntu will
suffice. But that does not mean that Ubuntu is a failure. And,
again, Ubuntu's main target is the desktop sector and although they
are slowly crawling on the server and enterprise space, they have
yet to show enterprise tools compared to RHEL and SuSE. So yes, we
can't expect massive Ubuntu deployments in the enterprise just yet.
But they're getting there. Again, this doesn't mean Ubuntu is a
failure :)
As we know RHEL is standalone distro and ubuntu is based on Debian.
All the functionality is of Debian then? just a little more tools in
ubuntu along with appearance changes? Why not to use debian then,
I am talking about SUSE and RHEL because all they have is their own,
They haven't copied anything from anything else, We need novell in
all feilds. Even in unix and windows too (Specially in LAN IPX and
other networking)
Exactly. For stability, a lot of enterprise deployments opt for
Debian for stability reasons and not for bleeding edge packages.
Where Fedora is to RHEL, so is Ubuntu is to Debian.
Those who are good in linux are no more on ubuntu or debian they are
practicing in suse and rhel just to get some experience about these
distros and get some gud job in companies.
Not true :). It depends upon the need. I'm working for an
enterprise, and I use Ubuntu as my primary desktop. I have Fedora
and CentOS virtual machines on remote servers. SLES on local
servers. I'm using all of them simultaneously. As a consultant, it
is my job to explore these distros and and provide alternatives to
the client.
There are cases where you just want to use RHEL, sometimes you want
to use SLES, and times you just want Debian or Ubuntu. It's up to
you really :). I have different distros for no particular reason at
all. I love variety. That makes me explore them as well in a
production setting. :)
I am sorry for my bad english as english is not my first language,
Thats why i cant speak it perfect.
I am sorry if I have offended with my posts :)
No problem. No offense taken. We are just having a healthy
discussion :). We're all on the same side :).
--
Penguin, penguin, and more penguin.
Believe that within the brain is a brain, and within it another
brain, and so on and so forth.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux
Users Group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit our group at
http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux
Users Group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit our group at
http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit our group at
http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
