Oh sorry if my words were not meaning as example. I just said about windows that was just an example.
Well I am sorry for that friend :) On 26 April 2010 09:55, Xavier Naldo <[email protected]> wrote: > Right on brother!! but for the group's sake, CANT WE ALL JUST GET ALONG??? > We are LINUX, NOT winblows (ooops sorry, windows). Isnt it our goal to > improve the GNU/Linux OS? That is what makes Linux so special, is that we > have variety and it feeds for different strokes for different folks!! > In my opinion, Linux is the people's operating system. AND IT IS MUCH > BETTER THAN WINDOWS! > > > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:50 AM, hard wyrd <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:37 PM, ◣_◢ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> RHEL is Linux. Ubuntu is Linux. So what's the difference? >>> >>> Windows XP is windows, Windows Server 2k8 is windows, whats the >>> difference? >>> tools? yes obviously tools. Because of these tools servers are servers >>> and other distros are others. If we can make these tools our self (As you >>> said linux is Open) Yes we can make these tools just by spending a lot of >>> time in this. Nothing is impossible in Linux. But yeah if you can make it >>> then there is no difference in RHEL and ubuntu, About ubuntu lucid servers. >>> I have personal experience that they just dont work perfect, There are much >>> bugs to fix. thats why ubuntu is continuously launching new versions. >>> >> >> My premise _exactly. Which is why you think _first_ when deploying Ubuntu >> in an enterprise environment and assess what you need. There are niches that >> RHEL works perfectly well, and where Ubuntu will suffice. But that does not >> mean that Ubuntu is a failure. And, again, Ubuntu's main target is the >> desktop sector and although they are slowly crawling on the server and >> enterprise space, they have yet to show enterprise tools compared to RHEL >> and SuSE. So yes, we can't expect massive Ubuntu deployments in the >> enterprise just yet. But they're getting there. Again, this doesn't mean >> Ubuntu is a failure :) >> >> >>> >>> As we know RHEL is standalone distro and ubuntu is based on Debian. >>> All the functionality is of Debian then? just a little more tools in >>> ubuntu along with appearance changes? Why not to use debian then, >>> I am talking about SUSE and RHEL because all they have is their own, They >>> haven't copied anything from anything else, We need novell in all feilds. >>> Even in unix and windows too (Specially in LAN IPX and other networking) >>> >>> >> >> Exactly. For stability, a lot of enterprise deployments opt for Debian for >> stability reasons and not for bleeding edge packages. Where Fedora is to >> RHEL, so is Ubuntu is to Debian. >> >> >>> >>> Those who are good in linux are no more on ubuntu or debian they are >>> practicing in suse and rhel just to get some experience about these distros >>> and get some gud job in companies. >>> >> >> Not true :). It depends upon the need. I'm working for an enterprise, and >> I use Ubuntu as my primary desktop. I have Fedora and CentOS virtual >> machines on remote servers. SLES on local servers. I'm using all of them >> simultaneously. As a consultant, it is my job to explore these distros and >> and provide alternatives to the client. >> >> There are cases where you just want to use RHEL, sometimes you want to use >> SLES, and times you just want Debian or Ubuntu. It's up to you really :). I >> have different distros for no particular reason at all. I love variety. That >> makes me explore them as well in a production setting. :) >> >> >>> >>> I am sorry for my bad english as english is not my first language, Thats >>> why i cant speak it perfect. >>> I am sorry if I have offended with my posts :) >>> >>> >> No problem. No offense taken. We are just having a healthy discussion :). >> We're all on the same side :). >> >> >> -- >> Penguin, penguin, and more penguin. >> >> Believe that within the brain is a brain, and within it another brain, and >> so on and so forth. >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users >> Group. >> To post a message, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit our group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users > Group. > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > For more options, visit our group at > http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup > -- There are two kinda Impossibles 1. Possible Impossible 2. Impossible Impossible Possible Impossible is about what some people says; "Nothing is impossible, man efforts to make impossible just possible" Quid says; "Impossible for me is unknown" And those who know "Impossible Impossible" and believe in that, they just don't know me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Linux Users Group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit our group at http://groups.google.com/group/linuxusersgroup
