June 24 for both LCAF related and mobility sets? Fine with me.

Dino

> On Oct 16, 2023, at 4:46 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.i...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dino 
> 
> The groupings look good!
> 
> Some dates look too aggressive Nov 2023:  draft-ietf-lisp-geo, 
> draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding, RFC 8060 and 9306 (Standards Track). We are 
> already there ...
> As the dates proposed are target dates, i suggest we keep the date of June 
> 2024 but if we can go faster it is all good. thoughts?
> 
> Similar comment for mobility. 
> 
> Thanks
> Padma
> 
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:35 PM Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What do you think of putting some major milestones for mobility and 
> > security sections rather than per document?
> 
> I think security is further out compared to mobility. Just because other 
> groups will have to peer-review the security documents. But good suggestion 
> and will incldue below the set that go together (IMO).
> 
> So here is what I suggest:
> 
> For June 2024: Mobility documents as a set to IESG, which include:
> 
>   draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility, draft-ietf-lisp-mn, 
> draft-ietf-lisp-predictive-rlocs, draft-ietf-lisp-vpn
> 
> And for June 2025: Security documents as a set to IESG, which include:
> 
>   draft-ietf-lisp-crypto (RFC8061 to Standards Track), 
> draft-ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-anonymity
> 
> And then, not related to what you asked for, to put all LCAF related stuff in 
> one set:
> 
> For Nov 2023:
> 
>   draft-ietf-lisp-geo, draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding, RFC 8060 and 9306 
> (Standards Track)
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Dino
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to