On 08-Jan-99 Jay Fenello wrote:
> Unfortunately, that is not correct :-(
> Here is the latest participants list posting:
>
> Jay.
Thank you for reposting this Jay.
> In the case
> where new and substantive inputs are received from recognized
> organizations, an individual representing this organization may be asked to
> meet with the drafting team to clarify any positions or points of
> integration.
I see that in this statement that contradict their earlier claim to openness.
Only recognized organizations' comments are welcome and will be seriously
considered.
> There is a lot of work to be done given the tight deadline and it is
> expected that much of the integration work will be done prior to the
> meeting on the 22nd. This way, the meeting can be used to reach consensus
> on what should be a small number of remaining open items. Progress will be
> posted periodically on the DNSO web-site and more information on the
> process and on next steps will be posted on the web-site in the coming days.
And this shows the disdain that this group has for online participation. Face
to face meetings are the only way they are willing to conduct business, and
this really does serve their purposes well, by excluding those who are unable
to attend for whatever reason.
This is so pathetic, but also frightening because of the implications these
backroom deals could have on all of us.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07-Jan-99
Time: 23:29:58
----------------------------------
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
