Then why was this announcement NOT sent the discuss list?
The systematic neglect of the discuss participants who did not attend any of
the hastily disorganized face to face meetings continues. The discuss list was
a bone to throw out so they could point to it and say they solicted public
comment. Nothing more.
No substantive efforts to conduct new drafts has occured there, dispute
comments.
Look at the ORSC effort. Revised drafts were put forth every day, usually
multiple times. Numerous comments were received, and they were written and
republished for more comments. This was a substantive effort to conduct the
drafting in a public an dopen fashion. No such effort ever existed for the
DNSO.org, it would of been too dangerous to the interests of the special
interests they are catering to.
On 08-Jan-99 Michael Sondow wrote:
> Jay Fenello a �crit:
>>
>> At 1/8/99, 12:02 AM, Einar Stefferud wrote:
>> >There is some confustion here;-)...
>> >
>> >The <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailing list passed into disuse just about
>> >the time that Joe Sims was added, in part because of the controversy
>> >that arose because Joe Sims was added, and in part because the
>> >drafting work of the list was done and complete, and it was time to
>> >move out to the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list.
>> >
>> >So, let's not go overboard here. We are having enough trouble
>> >maintaining the canoe in its upright configuration!
>> >
>> >Cheers...\Stef
>>
>> Hi Stef,
>>
>> Unfortunately, that is not correct :-(
>> Here is the latest participants list posting:
>>
>> Jay.
>
> Jay, the people on the drafting team and the other teams that formed after
> Monterrey are sending messages like that one to all the dnso.org lists all
> the time. It doesn't mean that there's any real dialogue going on on those
> lists. I haven't seen any postings all week on that list except for these
> "official" announcements. The participants certainly aren't using that list.
> It's dead, for all intents and purposes. I sent a message to it a few days
> ago and didn't get a single reply.
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 07-Jan-99
Time: 23:43:11
----------------------------------
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
