At 06:12 PM 1/11/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Martin B. Schwimmer wrote:
>
>> I asked to get the lists to test the choices. Would people agree as to
>> what type of entity fell where or would there be disputes requiring the
>> "Membership Committee" to make rulings all the time.
>
>No to the first question, and yes to the second. The situation will be
>untenable.
>
>I haven't heard any real disagreement with simply having "individual" and
>"business" membership.
Actually, in a loose fashion, you've heard some agreement. It is the ISOC
model. I keep trying but the only other breakdown that makes sense to me is
users/ISPs. Since there are problems with both of them, a flat model comes
to mind.
___________________________________________________
Roeland M.J. Meyer -
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet phone: hawk.lvrmr.mhsc.com
Personal web pages: http://staff.mhsc.com/~rmeyer
Company web-site: http://www.mhsc.com
___________________________________________________
I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing...
-- Thomas Jefferson
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
