Diane C wrote: >I forgot to mention that the comments that come in from people listening >to the >webcasts are also read to the assembly. Only on the first day. On the second day, Esther promised several times that she would "get to" the written comments from the webcast, but she never really did. There was a passing few notices of the support for the Individual constituency, but VERY little mention of the serious opposition to the WIPO proposal provided by the webcast viewers.
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN... Sue Leader
- Private response to:... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's B... Jonathan Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN... Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law
- Re: [IFWP] Today's I... Diane Cabell
- Diane Cambell Re... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Today... Adam Peake
- Re: [IFWP] ... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Today... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] ... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IF... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin... Ellen Rony
- RE: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin... Ben Edelman
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin... Esther Dyson
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin... Tamar Frankel
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's B... Diane Cabell
- [Attention Berkman cente... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's B... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Today's ICANN's Berlin... Richard J. Sexton
