Dear Atilla,
>Now where did I say the word "fraud?" The question was, "can the board be
>trusted?" Given the first hand evidence I have witnessed, and the fact
>that board meetings are secret, and may other issues that I have personally
>witnessed and been a part of, I'm afraid my answer is "no." Does this mean
>I believe they have perpetrated fraud? Not necessarily. I do not have
>enough evidence one way or the other to make that determination in my mind.
> But frankly, I do NOT believe that this board can be trusted.
The ICANN trust-o-meter is now hitting the peg in the
negative direction.
Check out the latest version of the GAC minutes. It
turns out that not only have the infamous Operating Principles
been circulating around in secret for the past several months,
they have apparently been delivered to the ICANN Board "...to
amend the ICANN Bylaws to harmonize with the GAC's Operating
Principles."
--tony
