> That's a hard question to answer.  So much of the information about the
> Board and its actions disseminated on this list or reported in the media
> has been provided by paid agents of NSI, some of whom did not reveal that
> relationship when providing or characterizing the information.

We don't need that kind of McCarthy-like smeering.

There are lots of people engaged in this discussion who are being paid.

Some are from corporations looking to protect their intersts, some from
corporations hoping to get a piece of the pie, some are from law firms
watching their clients' interests, others are from law firms looking to
obtain clients.

I would submit that about the only people here who are not "paid agents"
are those who are paying for all of this out of their own pockets and not
receiving a tax deduction for it.  There's not many of us who would meet
that standard.

Just because somebody gets paid or gets support to participate doesn't
make them a stooge.


                --karl--


Reply via email to