Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
>
> > That's a hard question to answer. So much of the information about the
> > Board and its actions disseminated on this list or reported in the media
> > has been provided by paid agents of NSI, some of whom did not reveal that
> > relationship when providing or characterizing the information.
>
> We don't need that kind of McCarthy-like smeering.
>
> There are lots of people engaged in this discussion who are being paid.
>
> Some are from corporations looking to protect their intersts, some from
> corporations hoping to get a piece of the pie, some are from law firms
> watching their clients' interests, others are from law firms looking to
> obtain clients.
>
> I would submit that about the only people here who are not "paid agents"
> are those who are paying for all of this out of their own pockets and not
> receiving a tax deduction for it. There's not many of us who would meet
> that standard.
>
> Just because somebody gets paid or gets support to participate doesn't
> make them a stooge.
>
> --karl--
Like, will somebody hurry up and pay me already?
--
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin
Box 532, RR1 phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J0X 1N0 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
