>The last authoritative, community-based consensus >on that question was the White Paper, which ICANN >has ignored since its inception. And that's being overly kind. The changes between the green paper and white paper could not be justified from the public comments. It's the private comments that gutted it. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple roots Jonathan Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple roots Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple roots Jonathan Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple r... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple r... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multi... Onno Hovers
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple roots Onno Hovers
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... Jeff Williams