Patrick Greenwell a écrit: > > Doubtlessly you'll scream at me for not agreeing with your assesment. I sceram at no one. But are you content, then, that the NC is in the hands of CORE (and ISOC)? Is this, according to you, the fulfillment of the White Paper's call for self-organization by all stakeholders? Are you helping here to justify CORE and ISOC's takeover of the DNSO because it keeps users like me out, which you seem to be in agreement with, since you have insulted and rejected and aggressed against us ever since we dared to intervene on these lists and in the NewCo, despite the fact that the White Paper and the DOC have stated that the DNSO should be divided equally between users and operators? I guess that, for you, capture of ICANN by CORE and ISOC, so long as it excludes the users, is the lesser of two evils. At least, that's what you seem to be saying.
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple r... Onno Hovers
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple roots Onno Hovers
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICANN Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Thoughts on ICA... William X. Walsh