Re: [IFWP] ICANN position on multiple roots

[Onno Hovers]

In article <v04020a33b3a45e4b8826@[192.168.0.1]> Gordon Cook wrote:
>>
>>That's what I understand to be in progress today.  You may think the gov't
>>unwise to have designated ICANN "newco" and to be in the process of
>>transitioning IANA's functions to it--but that doesn't mean the gov't isn't
>>in the process of giving it just that mandate.  ...JZ
>>

> the gov't...... who in hell is this government jonathon?  one woman - becky
> burr - doing what the hell she chooses with no open process behind.....
> just backroom deals....that is some helluva government!

I am sure that the people in favour of the gTLD-MoU felt the same way, about
17 months ago, when the opponents were cheering about how the USG rejected
the MoU. The USG knife can cut both ways, you know.

-- 
Onno Hovers, MS/Ir, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]