Joe and all,
You are exactly right here Joe. This has not really been done
on a broad enough scale. Why? Well because there has not been
sufficient enough $$ to market it adequately, for one thing. The
other is that the "Traditionalists" have done all they can do to
discredit it, which I find to be a "Sour Grapes" attitude.
J. Baptista wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 1999, Greg Skinner wrote:
>
> > "J. Baptista" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > That's not really an issue - is it. Name daemons come prepackaged with
> > > the root servers already prelisted in the root cache file. Few DNS
> > > administrators even know there are options.
> >
> > So under what circumstances would they be so inclined to make changes?
>
> Exactly. Why would they want to change? You've hit it on the head Greg.
> The easiest way to get them to switch is via the time honoured human
> tradition of paying for it. Sexton advocates it should be via the
> internet tradition of trust and service. I really don't care which way it
> goes.
>
> The trick is to communicate that these options exist. Something which has
> not yet been done.
>
> Cheers
> Joe Baptista
>
> --
> Planet Communication & Computing Facility [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Public Access Internet Research Publisher 1 (212) 894-3704 ext. 1033
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
