On 04/29/2014 03:44 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > This discussion is going off in quite a few directions. Some > arguments are concerned with UI design. Some are concerned with UI > responsiveness. Some are concerned with network bandwidth. Some are > concerned with the technology behind the solution.
Well yes, because those are all important considerations that should be thought about before a feature like this should be implemented. > Jonathan brings up a valid point about the future home of the LSP. > Placing LSP into a CMS could really break this stuff. I agree withe > Vesa's point about version control being overkill, but I believe the > proposal is about the capabilities of download AND upload, which would > need some versioning if done properly. Are we going to want upload things directly from LMMS too? I thought LMMS would just have download functionality builtin. Download is easy, but upload is probably better left for the web browser, so we don't have to deal with the additional complexity of user accounts, authentication etc. in LMMS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
