I was actually just thinking about that. Is there someone that can work on
making the code RT-safe? Do we have any goals as to when we want RTS code
by?
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 03:52 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> > I agree uploads at this point should not be done via lmms. LMMS is
> > already as complex as it is. It will be getting more complex as we
> > move towards real time safe code with paul's unison core.
> >
>
> Offtopic, but: let's stop talking about "when we get the Unison core".
> Because as it is now, I don't see any work being done towards that... I
> haven't even heard of Paul in many weeks now, and the Unison git repo
> hasn't been touched in several months.
>
> I don't mean this in a negative way, but it seems to me that Paul has
> lost interest or doesn't have the time to work on the Unison core. I'm
> just saying, we shouldn't count on it happening any time soon because I
> don't see any work being done - by anybody - towards it. I think we
> should rather focus on improving what we have now and trying to improve
> our current codebase, maybe we can get what we have now more towards
> rt-safety...
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
