Hi Bert, Rafaella, Santiago and all others, From: "Bert Meersma"
> 1. All reviewers stop with reviewing and attach their files to issue 59216. > 2. Alpha has a look at the comments in the review files and looks which > type of comment is repeated often. > 3. Alpha changes the help by using the comments found in step 2. This > will result in a lot less comments in the remaining reviews. Do you mean that only the frequently found errors (FFE) will be fixed? It will certainly not mean that these FFE will be fixed in all places as it turned out that Alpha didn't receive the complete help (parts were ported directly from 1.1.x). > 4. Then a new set of help files is build. > 5. The reviewers start reviewing the new set of help files. This means to me: 5. The reviewers start reviewing the new set of help files all over again. Why? a) It is not certain that the entire help text was available for Alpha, so errors (even FFE) may appear in the help text b) Only FFE were fixed and the review files are probably not modified accordingly For me it's not a big problem as I started reviewing recently after being ill for a few weeks, but I don't think that those who already reviewed substantial parts of the help will fancy the idea of starting all over again. It seems a good idea at first, but I'm not sure if it speeds up the entire process in the end. It really depends on the number of isues that will be fixed, the question whether Alpha will have the entire help text and how long it will take before the new help files will be available. Regards, Jigal. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
