If the <Primary/> element is not present then Log4J could load the configuration file as it is doing rite now.
Infact if two config files have <Primary/> element, then Log4J will load the first one --Siva Jagadeesan -----Original Message----- From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 2:24 PM To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: Inherited Logger Config? At 02:14 PM 3/28/2003 -0600, Jagadeesan,Sivakumar wrote: >What I suggest is: > >We could include a new Element in the config file <PRIMARY/> > >If this element is present then that config file should loaded by the Log4J. >This way the component providers , could include the config without this >Element. And the user in his config could have this Element and be relaxed >that his config file will be used for the logging. I don't understand. What happens if the <primary/> element is NOT present? >I have not seen the Log4J source. This is just a suggestion > >FEEDBACKS pls > >--Siva Jagadeesan > >-----Original Message----- -- Ceki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
