Hi,
>Instead, I have finally gotten around to writing a bug report about >the funky default behavior in log4j (which is my main reason for >wondering it log4j is already configured). > >http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28692
I've -1's this (message below), but stopped short of marking it as invalid/wontfix or something like that.
"I'm -1 on changing this: in the absence of explicit configuration, it's better to have more information than less, so the current default is best. Obviously there'll be scenarios where it's expensive and/or ill-fitting, but those people should explicitly configure log4j. The default config of a logging system should never hide/reject logging statements."
Yoav Shapira
Well, I did make the extra step because Bill's suggestion has no chance of being accepted.
-- Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
