From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> Sent: 16 June 2021 21:46
This document (and the code point) are intended to be in line with 5309. I believe they are. If we got it wrong, please help us fix it. A reference would be reasonable to add. (The IANA entry for the code point does reference 5309.) <tp> which confused me as RFC5309 has no IANA considerations and no reference to 303. I understand how this is so but think that this I-D could explain this. I think that the I-D is wrong to ask IANA to perform an update - the update has happened. What would help would be for this I-D to explain that the allocation was made by Expert Review and to ask that IANA update the reference to point to this I-D and then this I-D can point back to RFC5309. This is almost an updates to 5309 as it give a value to the specification - I can see the IESG having fun with that concept but I would go for it. I think too that this I-D should reference and build on RFC5309. At present it looks like an Unused Ref. Tom Petch Thank you, Joel On 6/16/2021 4:41 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Hi Joel, > > At first I wondered where this document should reside and then decided that > LSR is probably as good as any other place. > > Can you guys check whether it is mostly in line with > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5309/ and comment as to whether it should > be referenced? > > Thanks, > Acee > > > On 6/16/21, 11:10 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Joel M. Halpern" > <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > Recently, Ericsson requested and received an IF Type assignment from > IANA (with expert review) for point-to-point over Ethernet links. > > It was noted during the discussion around the assignment that a document > (eventually, we hope, an RFC) describing how to use that and why we > asked for it would be helpful. > > The below announcement is that draft. We would like to work with the > community to improve and clarify teh draft. > > Thank you, > Joel > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 07:00:04 -0700 > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Reply-To: internet-dra...@ietf.org > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : Interface Stack Table Definition for Point to > Point (P2P) Interface over LAN > Authors : Daiying Liu > Joel Halpern > Congjie Zhang > Filename : draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt > Pages : 7 > Date : 2021-06-16 > > Abstract: > The point-to-point circuit type is one of the mainly used circuit > types in link state routing protocol. It is important to identify > the correct circuit type when forming adjacencies, flooding link > state database packets, and monitor the link state. This document > defines point-to-point interface type and relevant stack tables to > provide benefit for operation, maintenance and statistics. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan/ > > There is also an htmlized version available at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > i-d-annou...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
