Hi all,

I have reviewed the draft,and support its adoption.

I think the proposed protocol extension can simplify significantly the recovery 
and management of inter-AS topology, and also facilitate the optimal forwarding 
path selection based on the attributes of stub links.


Best regards
Guozhen


> 2024年1月6日 08:23,Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/>
> 
> Please indicate your support or objections by January 19th, 2024.
> 
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any 
> IPR that applies to the draft.
> *** Please note that this is the second WG adoption poll of the draft. The 
> first one was tried two years ago and you can see the discussions in the 
> archive:
> [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-02 (ietf.org) 
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Li7wJsaY68gzJ8mXxff7K-Fy_nw/>
> 
> Thanks,
> Yingzhen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to