Hi all, I have reviewed the draft,and support its adoption.
I think the proposed protocol extension can simplify significantly the recovery and management of inter-AS topology, and also facilitate the optimal forwarding path selection based on the attributes of stub links. Best regards Guozhen > 2024年1月6日 08:23,Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> 写道: > > Hi, > > This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/> > > Please indicate your support or objections by January 19th, 2024. > > Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any > IPR that applies to the draft. > *** Please note that this is the second WG adoption poll of the draft. The > first one was tried two years ago and you can see the discussions in the > archive: > [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-02 (ietf.org) > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Li7wJsaY68gzJ8mXxff7K-Fy_nw/> > > Thanks, > Yingzhen > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr