Hi, all
I support the adoption. I agree with the idea:
Considering there are many links and complex interconnections among the
ASBRs that located in different AS domains, the proposed protocol extension can
certainly ease the recovery and management of inter-AS topologies.
Best Regards
Zongpeng Du
duzongp...@foxmail.com & duzongp...@chinamobile.com
From: Yingzhen Qu
Date: 2024-01-06 08:23
To: lsr; lsr-chairs
Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes
(01/05/2024 - 01/19/2024)
Hi,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/
Please indicate your support or objections by January 19th, 2024.
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR
that applies to the draft.
*** Please note that this is the second WG adoption poll of the draft. The
first one was tried two years ago and you can see the discussions in the
archive:
[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-02 (ietf.org)
Thanks,Yingzhen
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
