Hi,
I don't believe any of what is being proposed in the draft is necessary.
There are existing mechanism available to advertise an inter-AS link.
Using the prefix advertisement to pair the two ends of the inter-AS link
is a bad idea IMHO. There are better ways of doing it - e.g.
Local/Remote Identifiers, IPv4 interface address/IPv4 neighbor address,
IPv6 Interface Address/IPv6 Neighbor Address - these are all allowed in
the inter-AS reachability information.
thanks,
Peter
On 06/01/2024 01:23, Yingzhen Qu wrote:
Hi,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes/>
Please indicate your support or objections by January 19th, 2024.
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of
any IPR that applies to the draft.
*** Please note that this is the second WG adoption poll of the draft.
The first one was tried two years ago and you can see the discussions in
the archive:
[Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-wang-lsr-stub-link-attributes-02
(ietf.org)
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Li7wJsaY68gzJ8mXxff7K-Fy_nw/>
Thanks,
Yingzhen
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
