Julius, As I said, "with otherwise proven software". I take it Sophos is a precompiled binary. In that case, sure. Your underlying system libraries could have an effect, especially the way Red Hat likes to play with versions of glibc... But in this case it was about the LTSP distributed binaries running on an LTSP client. The system environment is proven. The libs on the client have nothing to do with the libs of the host OS on the LTSP server. The same LTSP binaries are running all over the planet without segfaults. Therefore, hardware...
Jason > Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 21:22:21 -0400 (EDT) > From: Julius Szelagiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] segmentation fault > > Jason, > try this for size: same physical machine, sophos mailmonitor and > antivirys package dies with segmentation fault under rh7.3 and runs fine > under rh7.2. i dare say it is the software, not the hardware. julius > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Jason Bechtel wrote: >> For me, seg. fault immediately implies hardware problem (at >> least with otherwise proven software). See below for more >> comments... ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
