Here's the wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ
Thanks, Troy On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Michael, > > That worked! > > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now. > > Thanks, > Troy > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon > <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: >> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes. >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# stuff and >> > the other directory stuff." >> > >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# branch, but >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I didn't >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass. >> > >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure" >> > >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this exact >> > purpose. It's here: >> > >> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-change >> > >> > >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list of tasks >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where they can >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority (like >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower priority like >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in creating >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might want to >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority. >> > >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list the >> > details >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I don't >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can whoever >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is 'thoward'. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Troy >> > >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if there is a >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory stuff. If >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then remove it >> > from >> > > the trunk. >> > > >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can update >> > us >> > > if he ever got an answer >> > > >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently assigned >> > to >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be out of >> > date >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from Pasha >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a review. >> > I >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should have. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ---------------------------------------- >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200 >> > > > From: ma...@rotselleri.com >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516) >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory >> > > structure we have >> > > > > going >> > > > >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure. >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and in >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for 2.9.4, >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them makes me >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding. >> > > > >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working (not to >> > > mention I don't know >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from Alex in a >> > > while, who I think is >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject. >> > > > >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version. >> > > > >> > > > > -.NET syntax. >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use. >> > > > >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the idea of you >> > > could run Luke in >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and the api >> > > provided, no need >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). That said, >> > I >> > > don't think it's top >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation. >> > > > >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have. >> > > > >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps provide >> > an >> > > update on >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit bucket at >> > one >> > > point, and then I >> > > > > lost track.. >> > > > >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. I >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is >> > > > continued on >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting of >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated. >> > > > >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task LUCENET-397, is >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper work >> > > > required? >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > /amanuel >> > > >> > >
