You never know. Personally I generally have most tech people on a list rather directly following them.
But thanks. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Wyatt Barnett <wyatt.barn...@gmail.com>wrote: > Retweeted. Though I doubt any of the ~100 people following me aren't in > the 36 following him . . . > > On 5/11/11 2:39 PM, "Michael Herndon" <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > > >If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a retweet > >his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks. > > > >"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET > >HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon " > > > >Cheers, > >- Michael > > > >On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Here's the wiki page: > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Troy > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > Michael, > >> > > >> > That worked! > >> > > >> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Troy > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon > >> > <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes. > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# > >>stuff > >> and > >> >> > the other directory stuff." > >> >> > > >> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# > >>branch, > >> but > >> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I > >> didn't > >> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass. > >> >> > > >> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure" > >> >> > > >> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this > >> exact > >> >> > purpose. It's here: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-cha > >>nge > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list > >>of > >> tasks > >> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where > >>they > >> can > >> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority > >>(like > >> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower > >>priority > >> like > >> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in > >> creating > >> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might > >>want > >> to > >> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority. > >> >> > > >> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list > >>the > >> >> > details > >> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I > >> don't > >> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can > >> whoever > >> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is > >> 'thoward'. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > Troy > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser < > >> geobmx...@hotmail.com > >> >> > >wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if > >>there > >> is a > >> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory > >> stuff. If > >> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like > >> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then > >>remove > >> it > >> >> > from > >> >> > > the trunk. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can > >> update > >> >> > us > >> >> > > if he ever got an answer > >> >> > > > >> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at > >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently > >> assigned > >> >> > to > >> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be > >>out > >> of > >> >> > date > >> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from > >> Pasha > >> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a > >> review. > >> >> > I > >> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should > >>have. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > ---------------------------------------- > >> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200 > >> >> > > > From: ma...@rotselleri.com > >> >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > >> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516) > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the > >>directory > >> >> > > structure we have > >> >> > > > > going > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure. > >> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done > >>and in > >> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for > >> 2.9.4, > >> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them > >> makes me > >> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working > >> (not to > >> >> > > mention I don't know > >> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from > >>Alex in > >> a > >> >> > > while, who I think is > >> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > -.NET syntax. > >> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the > >>idea > >> of you > >> >> > > could run Luke in > >> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and > >>the > >> api > >> >> > > provided, no need > >> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). > >>That > >> said, > >> >> > I > >> >> > > don't think it's top > >> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps > >> provide > >> >> > an > >> >> > > update on > >> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit > >>bucket > >> at > >> >> > one > >> >> > > point, and then I > >> >> > > > > lost track.. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. > >>I > >> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is > >> >> > > > continued on > >> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at > >> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting > >>of > >> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task > >>LUCENET-397, > >> is > >> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper > >>work > >> >> > > > required? > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > /amanuel > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >
