Retweeted. Though I doubt any of the ~100 people following me aren't in the 36 following him . . .
On 5/11/11 2:39 PM, "Michael Herndon" <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: >If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a retweet >his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks. > >"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET >HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon " > >Cheers, >- Michael > >On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Here's the wiki page: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ >> >> Thanks, >> Troy >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Michael, >> > >> > That worked! >> > >> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Troy >> > >> > >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon >> > <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes. >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# >>stuff >> and >> >> > the other directory stuff." >> >> > >> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# >>branch, >> but >> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I >> didn't >> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass. >> >> > >> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure" >> >> > >> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this >> exact >> >> > purpose. It's here: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-cha >>nge >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list >>of >> tasks >> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where >>they >> can >> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority >>(like >> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower >>priority >> like >> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in >> creating >> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might >>want >> to >> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority. >> >> > >> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list >>the >> >> > details >> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I >> don't >> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can >> whoever >> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is >> 'thoward'. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Troy >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser < >> geobmx...@hotmail.com >> >> > >wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if >>there >> is a >> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory >> stuff. If >> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like >> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then >>remove >> it >> >> > from >> >> > > the trunk. >> >> > > >> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can >> update >> >> > us >> >> > > if he ever got an answer >> >> > > >> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently >> assigned >> >> > to >> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be >>out >> of >> >> > date >> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from >> Pasha >> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a >> review. >> >> > I >> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should >>have. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > ---------------------------------------- >> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200 >> >> > > > From: ma...@rotselleri.com >> >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516) >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the >>directory >> >> > > structure we have >> >> > > > > going >> >> > > > >> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure. >> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done >>and in >> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for >> 2.9.4, >> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them >> makes me >> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working >> (not to >> >> > > mention I don't know >> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from >>Alex in >> a >> >> > > while, who I think is >> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > -.NET syntax. >> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the >>idea >> of you >> >> > > could run Luke in >> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and >>the >> api >> >> > > provided, no need >> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). >>That >> said, >> >> > I >> >> > > don't think it's top >> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps >> provide >> >> > an >> >> > > update on >> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit >>bucket >> at >> >> > one >> >> > > point, and then I >> >> > > > > lost track.. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. >>I >> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is >> >> > > > continued on >> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at >> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting >>of >> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task >>LUCENET-397, >> is >> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper >>work >> >> > > > required? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > /amanuel >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >>
