If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a retweet his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks.
"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon " Cheers, - Michael On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's the wiki page: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ > > Thanks, > Troy > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Michael, > > > > That worked! > > > > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now. > > > > Thanks, > > Troy > > > > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon > > <mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > >> > >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes. > >> > >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# stuff > and > >> > the other directory stuff." > >> > > >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# branch, > but > >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I > didn't > >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass. > >> > > >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure" > >> > > >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this > exact > >> > purpose. It's here: > >> > > >> > > >> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-change > >> > > >> > > >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list of > tasks > >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where they > can > >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority (like > >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower priority > like > >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in > creating > >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might want > to > >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority. > >> > > >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list the > >> > details > >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I > don't > >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can > whoever > >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is > 'thoward'. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Troy > >> > > >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser < > geobmx...@hotmail.com > >> > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if there > is a > >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory > stuff. If > >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like > >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then remove > it > >> > from > >> > > the trunk. > >> > > > >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can > update > >> > us > >> > > if he ever got an answer > >> > > > >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently > assigned > >> > to > >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be out > of > >> > date > >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from > Pasha > >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a > review. > >> > I > >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should have. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ---------------------------------------- > >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200 > >> > > > From: ma...@rotselleri.com > >> > > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516) > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the directory > >> > > structure we have > >> > > > > going > >> > > > > >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure. > >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done and in > >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for > 2.9.4, > >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them > makes me > >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding. > >> > > > > >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working > (not to > >> > > mention I don't know > >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from Alex in > a > >> > > while, who I think is > >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject. > >> > > > > >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version. > >> > > > > >> > > > > -.NET syntax. > >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use. > >> > > > > >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the idea > of you > >> > > could run Luke in > >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and the > api > >> > > provided, no need > >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). That > said, > >> > I > >> > > don't think it's top > >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation. > >> > > > > >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have. > >> > > > > >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps > provide > >> > an > >> > > update on > >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit bucket > at > >> > one > >> > > point, and then I > >> > > > > lost track.. > >> > > > > >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. I > >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is > >> > > > continued on > >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at > >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting of > >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated. > >> > > > > >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task LUCENET-397, > is > >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper work > >> > > > required? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > /amanuel > >> > > > >> > > > >
