of course:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imap#Advantages_over_POP


-- 
rgds,

Reinier Battenberg
Director
Mountbatten Ltd.
+256 758 801 749
www.mountbatten.net



On Thursday 28 October 2010 07:42:50 IT-Doc24 Ltd. - Rocco Radisch wrote:
> I agree with the comments, but speaking off advantages and disadvantages
> why not exploring them?
> The only "advantage" (IMHO) IMAP has is a) synchronising the inbox
> across several email clients including folders and sub-folders and b)
> IMAP-IDLE or called push email. Although, MS Outlook 2007 is still buggy
> on the IMAP implementation, IMAP-Idle is still not supported.
> Thunderbird is the winner here, also the offline cache implementation is
> by far smoother then with MS Outlook when it comes to slow links in my
> opinion.
> POP3 synchronisation across multiple email clients can be simulated via
> "keep copy on server option", but that doesn't work with user created
> sub-folders.
> Any other important features to compare?
> Rocco
> 
> On 27/10/2010 10:45 PM, Victor van R wrote:
> > On 27-10-2010 22:25, Markus A. Wipfler wrote:
> >> Tomorrow your hard disk crashes, or you need to access your mail from
> >> somewhere and you don't have your laptop / phone, what do you do ?
> > 
> > You have a copy of all your mail on the server (keep copy on server
> > option). That is what I like about pop! And not only the mail that you
> > kept through your email client with IMAP, but all!!
> > 
> > Maybe we could say: IMAP is the model that served well in the time
> > that storage space mattered?? But now...with no limitations... pop
> > rules ;-)
> > 
> > V
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > LUG mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> > 
> > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
> > 
> > All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> > 
> > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them
> > (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for
> > them in any way.
> > ---------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LUG mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
> 
> LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
> 
> All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> 
> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
> attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any
> way. ---------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug

LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to