When it was first built: whatever similar to the mandora Ms. in Brussels.
Galant material mainly.
The instrument fell into disrepair, and had its top redone in the 19th
century fashion, bridge moved.
And now: IT DOESN"T HAVE ENOUGH NECK FOR THE TYPICAL GIULIANI/SOR PAP.
So it was MOST LIKELY used in some kind of repertoire IM VOLKSTON.
RT
______________
Roman M. Turovsky
http://polyhymnion.org/swv

> And what do you think they played on these instruments if not guitar music
> (and please don't say 'folk music')
> 
> Rgds
> 
> M
> 
> Roman Turovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Only in the same sense as other lutes rebuilt into guitars in that era. In
> other words: NOT.
> Look at the Jauch in Budapest. It has the same "adaptation", but it's no
> guitar.
> RT 
> ______________
> Roman M. Turovsky
> http://polyhymnion.org/swv
> 
>> 
>> Thank you Roman,
>> 
>> in short - a guitar
>> 
>> M 
>> 
>> 
>> Roman Turovsky wrote:
>> A lautenguitarre of sorts, REMARCABLY with original double-strung set-up.
>> The main visual difference between gallichones and lautengitarren is the
>> BRIDGE POSITION, lute-like for the former, guitar-like for the latter.
>> The instrument in question has overall proportions and provenance of a
>> gallichone, but with that obvious "improvement".
>> RT
>> ______________
>> Roman M. Turovsky
>> http://polyhymnion.org/swv
>> 
>>> In that case - what do you think it was converted to?
>>> 
>>> M
>>> 
>>> Roman Turovsky wrote:
>>>> I agree this is a possibility; as you know, I think the weight of evidence
>>>> is
>>>> otherwise. But are you seriously suggesting that this was made or converted
>>>> to its present state in the period when the Gallichon/Colachon was played
>>>> in
>>>> the 18thC? 
>>>> Martyn
>>> No. I'd say it was bastardized sometime into the 19th century.
>>> RT
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Roman Turovsky wrote:
>>>>> In my opinion
>>>> WHich is a bit "leaky" as we say in the old country.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> how it could be used is more important than what you call it.
>>>>> Depending on how you tune a six-course instrument, it could function as
>>>>> a guitar, requinto (actually a "requinto" lute in this case), renaissance
>>>>> lute,
>>>>> a laud, or a mandolino lombardo ottavo.
>>>> FYI, Hoffmann was a very important figure in the history of lute, and there
>>>> is no reason to inflict on him any abuse by linguistic daftness.
>>>> 
>>>> This was a gallichone (100% certainty, look at the neck and pegbox), which
>>>> suffered bridge displacement which is sadly not atypical. Both Budapest
>>>> Jauch and Brunner baroque lutes suffered this at some point during the 19th
>>>> century.
>>>> RT
>>>> -- 
>>>> http://polyhymnion.org/torban
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Martyn Hodgson
>>>>> Sent: Mar 16, 2005 1:05 AM
>>>>> To: Mathias R?
>>>>> Cc: Lute Net 
>>>>> Subject: Re: Hoffmann Mandora/Gallichon
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you for your comments Mathias, but:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - are you not aware that guitars were made in lute shape in the 19thC (and
>>>>> in
>>>>> other shapes as well for that matter - eg lyre guitar).
>>>>> 
>>>>> - defining a guitar as a 'shallow bodied' instrument is surely asking for
>>>>> trouble - probably better to relate to musical practice - ie lute-guitars
>>>>> and
>>>>> similar played music written for ordinary guitars. Even well into the last
>>>>> century it was possible to buy sheet music asking for 'laute' or
>>>>> 'gitarre'.
>>>>> I
>>>>> have before me an original edition (c 1930) of 'Leonardo de Call/Notturno
>>>>> Op89/fur Flote(Geige), Bratsche and Gitarre(Laute)' published by Chr
>>>>> Friedrich Vieweg
>>>>> /BerlinLichterfelds. Interestingly, the cover has two figures playing
>>>>> Lauten
>>>>> (not Gitarren).
>>>>> 
>>>>> I therefore stick to my opinion that this is probably a guitar conversion.
>>>>> You
>>>>> may, of course, hold an entirely different view but perhaps it would be
>>>>> useful to support it with evidence rather than unsubstantiated comment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Martyn
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Mathias R?" wrote:
>>>>>>> My view is that it is most likely a guitar
>>>>> 
>>>>> guitars have shallow bodies, by definition, or so I'm told. Whatsoever
>>>>> this is, it is not a guitar.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (or rather late 19thC german lute/guitar) conversion direct from a
>>>>> lute.
>>>>> 
>>>>> wandervogel lutes (if that is what you meant to say) have single
>>>>> strings, not courses (i.e. double strings)
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There are numerous examples of 18thC Colachons/mandoras (see Gill et
>>>>> als) 
>>>>> 
>>>>> indeed. Why so much guesswork if the probable is so obvious.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would have thought so, if not for the pegbox, which is rather elegant,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> entirely uncharacteristic of the Wandervogels.
>>>>> 
>>>>> yes, indeed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mathias
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>>>>> --
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>>>> --
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>> 
>> 
>> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>> --
> 
> 
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 


Reply via email to