> But its proponents make specific claims about the structure of Mozart > (and, in rather a leap of logic, its effect on children) that would > not > be true of Bach, Scriabin, Shostakovich, Hindemith, Machaut, Dowland, > or Gesualdo. They're not true of Mozart in many cases, of course.
I thought that the structure of Mozart was conventional and relatively uncontroversial: head, torso, two arms, two legs, the usual minor appendages, etc. But there does seem to be some current excitement about his skull: http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp? id 060103142609990011&cid`1 ....Bob Clair -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
