> > 3. The harmonics' pitches are not consistent with each other, > > especially during the initial 0.3 second. For example, > > the fundamental can be at -4 cents, and the first harmonic > > (an octave above the fundamental) can be at +4 cents. > > > > These observations provide an ample hypothesis for tuner > > instability, but unfortunately suggest no solution. Tune by ear! :-) No tuner can "hear" harmonics, our ears can. So you get better results in matching different strings with inconsistent harmonics. Try to tune some much to small children's guitars with bad strings every day, and you'll learn, promised :-) Regards, Stephan To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. David Tayler
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Peter Nightingale
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Guy Smith
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. David Tayler
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. demery
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Ed Durbrow
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Stephan Olbertz
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Herbert Ward
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Herbert Ward
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Herbert Ward
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. David Tayler
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Peter Nightingale
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Herbert Ward
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Anthony Hind
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Anthony Hind
- [LUTE] Re: Fourier measurements of lute sound. Peter Nightingale