I once had a reviewer say that I played music from "largely bygone centuries" any idea what that means?
JM __________________________________________________________________ From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu on behalf of Lex van Sante Sent: Mon 6/1/2009 9:12 AM To: lute mailing list list Subject: [LUTE] Re: review Once a professional critic wrote about a recital of mine that my lute sounded like a crackling painting. Untill now I still don't know what substance he was on.xD Op 1 jun 2009, om 14:57 heeft howard posner het volgende geschreven: > > On Jun 1, 2009, at 5:31 AM, Rob MacKillop wrote: > >> The guy is a native-English speaker, so has no excuse, and, no, I >> have >> no idea what he is talking about. Still, a review's a review! > > It has the virtue of being obviously obscure; you're not deluded by > apparently clear writing into thinking it actually says anything > worth knowing. I've been involved in writing and editing reviews of > one sort or another (I'm doing both between reading and writing these > posts) and I've seen lots of reviews that appear to be using plain > English but consist entirely of throat-clearing, introductions of > topics that aren't pursued, and characterizations that are meaningful > only to the writer; at the end, there's no actual meaning. > > Here's a famous bit of critical drivel, from a 1979 review of Queen's > Jazz album by a rock critic with a big reputation. The prose is > fine, but when you've read it, try to relate it something in the real > world. Does "fascist rock band" actually mean something? Or is the > critic just suffering the effects of keen distaste mixed with drugs? > >> Whatever its claims, Queen isn't here just to entertain. This group >> has come to make it clear exactly who is superior and who is >> inferior. Its anthem, "We Will Rock You," is a marching order: you >> will not rock us, we will rock you. Indeed, Queen may be the first >> truly fascist rock band. The whole thing makes me wonder why anyone >> would indulge these creeps and their polluting ideas. >> >> > > For context, you can read the whole rant at: > > [1]http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/queen/albums/album/195592/review / > 5942056 > -- > > To get on or off this list see list information at > [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/queen/albums/album/195592/review/ 2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html