Tonal music makes all instruments sound better.
Atonal is simply worse on lutes, it just sounds execrable on them.

Having said that- contemporary doesn't have to ber atonal either, and a lot of it isn't, thankfully.
RT

----- Original Message ----- From: "Suzanne and Wayne" <angevin...@att.net>
To: "Lute list" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 3:12 PM
Subject: [LUTE] Re: New lute music


   I hadn't thought of overtones.  But this would explain why the more
  "tonal" music actually sounds a lot better.  Thanks for that thought.
  Suzanne

    -------------- Original message from "Roman Turovsky"
    <r.turov...@verizon.net>: --------------
    > It seems that the richness of lute overtones is NOT conducive to
    gratuitous
    > dissonance that is de rigeur in most modernist and neomodernist
    music. And
    > that naturally translates as acoustically inappropriate on a lute
    > (especially baroque, much more than renaissance one).
    > RT
    >
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "David Rastall"
    > To: "Mark Probert"
    > Cc: "Lute list"
    > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 1:07 PM
    > Subject: [LUTE] Re: New lute music
    >
    >
    > > On Sep 25, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Mark Probert wrote:
    > >
    > >> It seems, to my naif ear, that the composers don't really
    understand the
    > >> lute and how it works. Given the intervals and the tonality,
    why not
    > >> just play this stuff on a guitar?
    > >
    > > Why not indeed! Speaking for myself, I expect a certain type of
    sound
    > > from the lute, that I want to consider "historical", and when I
    don't
    > > hear that sound the lute can seem out of place. Your ear may not
    be as
    > > "naif" as you think. I can easily hear guitar in those pieces.
    > >
    > >> Please don't take me for a Luddite that is lost in the 16thC:
    it just
    > >> ain't so.
    > >
    > > I don't think one needs to be a Luddite in order to place the
    lute in a
    > > historical context. Not that it has to be imprisoned there, but
    we
    > > choose our battles: for some it's New Music On The Lute, for
    others it's
    > > Weiss, or Dowland, or whatever. Me, I'm lost in the 17th-
    century lute at
    > > this point (but that can change...).
    > >
    > > Best,
    > >
    > > DavidR
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > To get on or off this list see list information at
    > > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    > >
    >
    >
    >

  --



Reply via email to