Howdy, Roman... It's all good! LOL :-) If we play lutes at all (medieval, renaissance or baroque), we are in the same proverbial "family!" Heck, I have even embraced friends who "only" play krumhorn and cornamuse! :-) Best regards, Brent (everyone, please have a great rest of the weekend/enjoy it!)
----- Original Message ---- From: Roman Turovsky <r.turov...@verizon.net> To: howard posner <howardpos...@ca.rr.com>; Lute List <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu> Sent: Sun, July 17, 2011 12:14:32 PM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Mace P.S. And I do own an 8course now! RT >I had an 10course, briefly in 1988, so I have some idea. > The opinion is sufficiently widespread, too. > RT > > From: "howard posner" <howardpos...@ca.rr.com> >> On Jul 17, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Roman Turovsky wrote: >> >>> no, baroque lute requires a lot less physical labor: fewer notes, more >>> space between them. >> >> Roman will correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it's still the case >> that he's never played renaissance lute. >> >> >> >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >> > > >
