It seems excessively harsh to state that "We need to be wary of
   statements in Lundberg’s book, inasmuch as he died without finishing
   it...".  My reference to Lundberg's comments were gleaned personal
   conversation with Lundberg.  Yes, he was working hard on completing the
   book before he passed, and he very likely would have made further
   refinements, but the book was really a distillation of lengthy series
   of highly detailed articles previously published in American Lutherie,
   the quarterly journal of the Guild of American Luthiers.  It is unkind
   to call into question an entire important body of work due to a
   sentence that was likely misplaced by a hasty editor.  Apply your
   standard to other publications out there and we are compelled to
   discount the value of many works that have been given monumental status
   despite being rife with errors.  Francesco.

   RA
     __________________________________________________________________

   From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu <lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu> on behalf
   of howard posner <howardpos...@ca.rr.com>
   Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 2:06 AM
   To: lutelist Net
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Plucking Room

   We need to be wary of statements in Lundberg’s book, inasmuch as he
   died without finishing it and the publisher(s) chose to present it as
   is, although there are some things in it that he could not possibly
   have meant, such as “The one lute-family instrument being built during
   this period is the theorbo.”  (p. 12) He seems to have been referring
   to the 1600-1680, but there was never a time for which that statement
   would be true.  I don’t know he was trying to say.
   > On Jun 30, 2019, at 2:07 PM, ron.ba...@rwbanks.com wrote:
   >
   > While I'm a big fan of Lundberg's body of work, we'll need to agree
   to
   > disagree which camp the belly/soundboard it fits into.  For what it's
   worth,
   > violin makers commonly refer to their tops as bellies as
   well...taxonomy
   > among luthiers can be very generic.
   >
   > Let's also not forget that Lundberg made the comment on the banjo and
   the
   > importance of sustain, when discussing the early development of the
   lute.
   > He also said the following on page 30 of Historical Lute
   Construction:
   > "However, the need to sustain some notes, thereby adding a new
   dimension to
   > changes in rhythm and phrasing, became more and more important; so
   much so
   > that the main direction of tonal development through the Renaissance
   periods
   > and into the Baroque period was towards increasing sustain."
   (Lundberg,
   > Robert. Historical Lute Construction. Tacoma Washington: Guild of
   American
   > Luthiers, 2002)
   >
   > Sustain with lutes is at best a relative term.  I've played some
   lutes that
   > were as efficient as a Quaker Oats box, and some that would easily
   sustain
   > for 3-4 seconds.  What I was driving at was that unlike membrane
   tops, a
   > conscious effort was made to match the energy driven into the
   soundboard
   > (belly) with a system that provided a proper match to keep that
   energy from
   > dissipating too quickly.  Plate tuning, bar shape, bar location, and
   > possibly even belly scooping contribute to final outcome...which
   might be a
   > much more complex set of subsystems than a tensioned membrane.
   >
   > Let's also consider that like guitars, and unlike banjo's,
   Renaissance and
   > later lute bellies are structural and act both in tension and
   compression.
   > Membrane tops on the other hand, require a self-supporting structure,
   and
   > function using tension.  Unless turned into cuir bouilli, membranes
   really
   > can't act in compression.
   >
   > I'll not hazard a guess regarding the violin comments, as YMMV.  The
   violin
   > community does that instrument enough damage seeking pseudoscience
   answers
   > to shortcut time and good craftsmanship.
   >
   > Seriously though,  I appreciate your comments, and am glad to be a
   part of
   > this community.  I certainly don't hold the source of all truth
   regarding
   > the lute, so I'll gladly call myself out when my ideas go into attic
   Strad
   > territory.
   >
   > Ron Banks
   > Fort Worth, TX
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [1]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to