"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
>
> > Are we going to use this?
> >
> > - if (!isalnum(name[i]) && name[i] != '.')
> > + if (!isalnum(name[i]) && name[i] != '.'
> > + && name[i] != '-' && name[i] != '+' name[i] != '=' )
>
> Yes, that looks good.
>
> Lgb, will you apply that to the SpaceLess function?
>
> (I can't believe I didn't notice the isalnum() call ! :-)
>
> > The old SpaceLess code checked for all the exceptional characters
> > and replaced them with harmless ones. It turns out that it is too
> > numerous and inefficient, since it turns out that, depending on
> > how latex.fmt was built, LaTeX may not be able to handle 8 bit
> > characters in the file names. The new SpaceLess code is much more
> > clear and efficient IMHO.
>
> The efficiency argument is not important. This routine is not
> performance critical at all. But other than that, I agree that
> it's more simple.
>
> Greets,
>
> Asger
Erm, isn't that missing an &&?
