Leuven, E. schrieb:
what is destroyed?
> Please revert! (Or I'll do.)
the dialog layout was very messy, so please tell me what is wrong atm so
that i can address it...
No, this is not the way it works! I implemented that we now use the wrapfig-package for wrap floats.
We can therefore provide two new parameters. These are optional and after a discussion on the list
(see the one about my Box-patch some days ago) and in bug 3242 I implemented the current dialog
layout, with the checkboxes so that optional parameters are really optional. I therefore also built
this in the box-dialog.
But anyway, I absolutely don't like that you changed the dialog without asking before and/or reading
why it looks currently like this. With your "cleanup" you just reverted my complete work that costs
me some hours to get it in this state!
Uwe
