Uwe Stöhr wrote: > So why not directly stating that > an optional parameter is optional?
I agree with Edwin here. We shouldn't do that. The fact that something can be selected or not indicates clearly enough that it's optional. Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > So why not directly stating that > an optional parameter is optional?
I agree with Edwin here. We shouldn't do that. The fact that something can be selected or not indicates clearly enough that it's optional. Jürgen