Sven Hoexter wrote:
> So the only to viable options I see are
> a) remove the xdg-open calls
> aa) and maybe replace them with a list of the distro specific tools like
>     mimeopen or run-mailcap (pretty long and ugly list ...)
> b) try push some changes to xdg-open and hope for a fast adoption rate
> within the Linux distribution oekosystem.
>
> I guess a and aa) would be the faster once.

I think for now, we should revert revision 22000 (at least the xdg-open part).

Jürgen

Reply via email to