Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> I don't think that it would help a lot to hack parts of the mime >> detection > > DE detection will solve it, but it would uglify the code and could break > anytime DE change something etc. > >> > So the only to viable options I see are >> > a) remove the xdg-open calls > > agree with this.
Disagree, xdg-open works nicely for a vast number of (lyx) users. I consider the class/# of users where xdg-utils doesn't work as nicely to be the minority, and the focus should be to help fix these exceptional cases, not regress for everyone. imo. -- Rex
