"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Will anyone object the idea of totally removing hasLayout() and the > layout conversion process? Basically, any unknown textclass and > unknown layout will act like a standard layout but will keep their > names. Different textclasses can be applied to a document without the > current unknown -> standard conversion. The motivation is that as long > as these layouts look and work like standard, we should keep them to > avoid data loss.
If you can get it to work properly, this is definitely the way to go. This shall be done for unknown classes and for unknown layouts. JMarc
