On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Abdelrazak Younes <you...@lyx.org> wrote: > On 06/03/2010 14:43, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> >> John McCabe-Dansted schreef: >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW >>> <v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>> Did we leave the instability period that was expected due to: >>>> - threaded export, >>> >>> IMHO we should >>> #define EXPORT_in_THREAD 0 >> >> No, we should have this. > > FWIW I put this macro because I was not sure if the feature would converge > to a stable state, but this seems almost OK right now. Lots of people are > awaiting this feature so if we don't intent to go back, what about deleting > the old synchronous export code?
Well I can't compile my thesis with EXPORT_in_THREAD 1, due to #6516. I don't know if there are any other bugs in the threaded code that would prevent my thesis from compiling. Is there some cost to leaving the old code in until e.g. #6516 is fixed? -- John C. McCabe-Dansted
