On 06/03/2010 20:32, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Abdelrazak Younes<you...@lyx.org> wrote:
On 06/03/2010 14:43, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
John McCabe-Dansted schreef:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
<v.f.vanraveste...@tudelft.nl> wrote:
Did we leave the instability period that was expected due to:
- threaded export,
IMHO we should
#define EXPORT_in_THREAD 0
No, we should have this.
FWIW I put this macro because I was not sure if the feature would converge
to a stable state, but this seems almost OK right now. Lots of people are
awaiting this feature so if we don't intent to go back, what about deleting
the old synchronous export code?
Well I can't compile my thesis with EXPORT_in_THREAD 1, due to #6516.
I don't know if there are any other bugs in the threaded code that
would prevent my thesis from compiling.
Is there some cost to leaving the old code in until e.g. #6516 is fixed?
No, we can leave it if this is a blocker of course.
Abdel.
