Am 16.05.2015 um 07:45 schrieb Stephan Witt <[email protected]>:

> Am 16.05.2015 um 00:48 schrieb Enrico Forestieri <[email protected]>:
> 
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 03:45:28PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 15.05.2015 um 15:14 schrieb Enrico Forestieri <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 02:53:22PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:42:01PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you. The current splash has a size of 400x250. I'll attach the
>>>>>> 1600x1000 splash banner to test.
>>>>>> It would be great if this is ok too. If not I have to get it right 
>>>>>> myself.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why is this (compressed) svg image so big? Are you sure there is no
>>>>> embedded bitmap? That would defeat the purpose of using the svg format.
>>>> 
>>>> Indeed, I found the attached 4 (base64 encoded) bitmaps embedded in the 
>>>> svg.
>>>> That's bad.
>>> 
>>> Yes, Jürgen said it would be great to find someone who is able to do it 
>>> better.
>>> This one was made to have some SVG banner.
>> 
>> Sorry, I did not realize it was that same banner. But why did you attach it, 
>> then?
> 
> The SVG banner with design size 400x250 results in an pixmap of the same size.
> This is not enough for HiDPI. So, I've made a "bigger" one to get a crisp 
> banner.

I think using the QSvgRenderer class to load SVG images for HiDPI is better.
I'll check it.

Stephan

Reply via email to