On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 04:50:35PM +0000, Guenter Milde wrote: > * Changes must not only tested for compilation success but also for correct > output.
I don't think I would want to spend the time to manually inspect the output of all of the exports. > That said, I am not against the proposed changes (but Uwe is the one to > decide). Because of what I said above, I think you would be against the proposed changes. Correct? Perhaps there is some automatic way to do it, using a tool that looks for diffs in PDFs. diffpdf is useful, for example. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
