On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 01:21:17AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > OK, if all test are passed, we don't risk anything. the question is however, > if this is really necessary. Setting a package to no or to automatic does > not change anything since if it works when setting to no, it will also not > be used wit automatic.
It is not a necessary change and I don't think the benefits would be enormous. I do think that the small benefits would outweigh the very small risks. > So what is the benefit for the user Users often use our examples and templates as the base of a new file. If they do this and then try to use a feature of a package that we have disabled, they will have problems and might not understand why. > what for LyX and what for us documentation people? For example, see the thread reported by Jean-Pierre here that was solved by fixing the math options: https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg196026.html Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
